Weekly
One venture a week, put through the gate
A real idea, real sources, and the verdict — including the reason it was refused. Often it is refused. A letter that says no to things is more useful than one that recommends them, and it is the same argument the product makes.
Issue 001 — this product, refused by its own gate
The first issue is brockily itself. Five sources, found by search, labelled for what they actually are — including the one that argues against it.
The audit sorted the claims. “AI models often exhibit sycophancy” — supported, on two peer-reviewed sources. “Founders desire brutally honest feedback” — inference; the source is anecdotal with no methodology. “Founders are willing to pay for validation tools that challenge assumptions” — missing.
That last one is this product's entire premise, and nothing in the prompt said so. It found the hole on its own. The gate cleared it to build and refused it for publication, which is the correct answer and an awkward one.
The full working, including what the tool got wrong: how the scores are calculated.
Get it
The list is not open yet. Rather than collect addresses into nowhere, this form stays closed until there is a provider behind it to honour the unsubscribe.