A founder tool that refuses to publish a claim you cannot back.
The validation tools we surveyed supply evidence and leave the weighing to you. This one withholds the output until the evidence is there. See what we checked, and what the score does not measure. Below is a live venture in the database, judged right now — not a screenshot.
Validate your idea Expect a refusal. That is the demonstration — it refused this product too.
Live verdict · AI Sales Coach for Estate Agents
Refused — the evidence is not there yet
Only 1 unique source(s). The dimensions that exist score 30 / 100, but a base this small cannot carry a verdict — 2 more unique source(s), extract evidence from 1 more source(s).
What would change the verdict
- Add Sources — Add about 2 more unique source(s) to reach the minimum evidence base for BUILD.
- Import Evidence — Extract evidence from about 1 more source(s).
- Refresh Dossier — Rebuild the dossier after closing the evidence gaps so the BUILD gate can re-score.
It stops us too
Evidence-Gated Founder Desk
5 unique sources, all extracted, 74 on the claim audit — and still not cleared to publish. The claim this product rests on has nothing behind it yet, so the gate holds it at build. That is our own dossier.
An average would have let that through: the audit scores 74, comfortably past the threshold. A claim marked load-bearing has to be carried on its own, whatever the average says.
Why refusal is the feature
Supplying evidence is the norm
In one 2026 vendor comparison, source-linking was presented as the main
differentiator — a vendor ranking its own category, which this site
scores at 0.45 independence. Take it as weak evidence. Either way it is
table stakes here: claims carry [S1] markers resolving to
the source they came from.
This one withholds the output
A claim below the audit threshold does not get published. Not flagged, not warned about — withheld. You fix the evidence, or you do not ship the claim.
Then it helps you run it
Choosing and running are one system on one database. The venture you judged in stage one is the venture you execute in stage two, with the same evidence standard.